Drawing review
Revision, units, datums, tolerance notes, thread definitions, finish instructions, and unresolved assumptions should be visible before order approval.
Quality approach
Quality control starts at RFQ intake. The public site stays limited to process claims that can be supported, while draft or internal-only proof remains hidden until it is intentionally published.
Quote-stage controls
The first control is a drawing review that catches revision mismatch, conflicting tolerances, missing material definitions, undefined finish steps, and inspection gaps before the quote is released.
Revision, units, datums, tolerance notes, thread definitions, finish instructions, and unresolved assumptions should be visible before order approval.
Critical features, measurement method, and shipment records should match part risk. A report requirement discovered after production is already a process miss.
Material, process, drawing, and delivery changes should trigger an updated written assumption or buyer approval rather than informal shop-floor memory.
Publishing gate
Company identity claims, certifications, equipment lists, customer names, and case-study outcomes require a published evidence record. Until then, the process can be described, but the proof item stays private.
Workshop and product media should map to an internal source record before publication so the site does not imply unsupported capability or ownership.
A useful nonconformance record needs the drawing revision, affected quantity, measured result, supporting evidence, and requested disposition.
`draft` and `verified` records help internal control, but only `published` records appear on public pages. That keeps marketing language subordinate to the evidence gate.
Published evidence
No internal record is displayed here unless it has been promoted to published status.
Internal checklist covering revision control, units, datums, tolerances, finish notes, quantity breaks, and unresolved RFQ assumptions.
Review evidenceInternal worksheet used to map critical dimensions, sampling expectations, measurement method, and shipment records before production release.
Review evidenceSource-screened record for 12 operator-supplied workshop photographs showing machining equipment, processes, and floor activity.
Review evidencePublic disclosure defining ProtoRFQ as the managed RFQ intake and manufacturing coordination point while keeping the manufacturing route and order commitments specific to the written quote.
Review evidence